A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving future neighbours more than the development of a wall in a coastal web-site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has captivated national notice pursuing an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed relatives property at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of planning breaches, environmental issues, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Situations write-up about René Collier and the Irish Situations report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a local disagreement has progressed into a highly publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over building operates at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, find to develop their family members home. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, where by development pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying manufactured by their possible neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted underneath setting up authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally inhabitants of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their organizing permission by developing a wall outside of the boundaries of their internet site, resulting in an encroachment on the Exclusive Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result places are subject to rigorous controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments might have Long lasting ecological consequences, significantly inside of a sensitive coastal ecosystem including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach in their arranging authorization, and say the wall, that's partly developed, is in the right place. Their lawful team has characterised the action being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, exactly where sights of The ocean are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours from the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the website, In keeping with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-substantial drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, a picture that has considering the fact that come to be emblematic on the intensity of the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they were being meant to Assemble Visible proof in the wall’s situation relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website through the sea Irish Periods reported, describing how The 2 men entered the h2o throughout critical climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm water to photograph the website became The most placing descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances write-up about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that this kind of steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception the wall extended into an area affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as viewers sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to more submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
At the Main of your dispute is usually a disagreement around boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, continues to be described as meticulous in his examination of organizing paperwork, maps, and problems connected on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their action is motivated by issue for environmental security and adherence to scheduling regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving a private see, insisting rather that it is about making sure that progress at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they've explained their extensive-standing link to the realm and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few merely trying to establish a spouse and children property in accordance Together with the law. They deny the wall encroaches on a Distinctive Spot of Conservation and say that all will work are already carried out based upon Skilled advice and permitted ideas. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include getting into the sea during a storm, tend not to alter the underlying specifics.
The situation has also raised broader questions about how arranging disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst private land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now far more contentious.
The Irish Instances Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Times post about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Beforehand been involved with nearby advocacy on planning and environmental challenges, however not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by midsection-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded via waistline-significant water in the course of a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth of the coastline as well as the symbolic character on the act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an too much solution.
As the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome remains uncertain. The court docket must figure out whether the wall as built complies with preparing authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging problems. Nevertheless the human factor remains central: neighbours who must Are living along with each other long once the authorized costs have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction will work at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, although the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary problems for instance environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of the dispute stands partly crafted, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized queries. Irrespective of whether it's going to in the long run be altered, removed, or concluded as prepared will rely on the courtroom’s conclusions. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probably go on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to One of the more closely watched organizing disputes in north Dublin lately.